Is Waring BB340 Good?
Yes, based on its features, I would choose the BB340 for a small bar that makes frozen drinks each day. Its timer and pulse key give it a clear role. The timer helps set a fixed blend time. Pulse adds short bursts when a mix needs more work. In a Friday-night drink rush, I would value those tools more than a shiny base. That is a use case, not a claim from a hands-on test.
For my Waring BB340 vs BB900 choice, the BB340 feels like the more useful work tool on paper. I picture a backyard cookout where each batch uses the same recipe. A fixed time could help keep that routine on track. Still, a timer cannot fix too much ice or too little liquid. The jar holds 48 ounces, but that is its stated size, not a promise that every recipe can fill it to the brim.
What Makes It Stand Out / Key Features
- Timed controlA 99-second countdown timer supports set blend times.
- Speed choicesLow, high, and pulse offer more control than a basic two-speed switch.
- Clear jarThe 48-ounce BPA-free copolyester jar lets you watch the mix.
- Stackable jarsMatching jars stack to help save space.
- Removable padThe rubberized jar pad lifts off for cleanup.
- Daily workloadWaring recommends the BB340 for 25–49 drinks per day.
- Motor rating caveatThe current page lists 1.5 HP and 820 watts. Older Waring sheets list 1 HP. Check the exact unit.
- WarrantyThe current listing gives two years on the motor and one year on parts and labor.
My Recommendation
I would choose the BB340 for repeat drink batches, pulse control, and a busier daily routine. It leads my Waring BB340 vs BB900 comparison on useful features.
| Best For | Why |
|---|---|
| Small bars | Its stated workload suits 25–49 drinks per day. |
| Repeat recipes | A timer helps keep blend times consistent. |
| Frequent hosts | Pulse and a clear jar give more control over each batch. |
Is Waring BB900 Good?
It depends on how much you blend and which BB900 you mean. I would consider the BB900G for light drink service and a classic bar look. It has a 40-ounce glass jar and a plain switch for low, off, and high. That is easy to grasp. For a home bar used on weekends, I can see the appeal. There is no need to learn a panel just to make a small round of drinks.
My Waring BB340 vs BB900 decision changes once the jar enters the picture. The BB900P has a 48-ounce plastic jar. The BB900S has a 32-ounce steel jar, and Waring lists that model as discontinued. I would check the full model code before I bought one. For a game-day setup, I might like the BB900G’s glass jar. For more drink rounds, I would lean toward the BB340’s timer and pulse. Those are buying judgments from specs, not personal test results.
What Makes It Stand Out / Key Features
- Two-speed motorThe BB900G has a listed 1/2 HP motor with low and high speeds.
- Plain switchA three-position toggle gives low, off, and high control.
- Chrome housingA zinc die-cast base has a classic chrome finish.
- Glass optionThe BB900G includes a 40-ounce glass jar.
- Other jar optionsThe BB900P has a 48-ounce copolyester jar. The discontinued BB900S has a 32-ounce steel jar.
- Light-service workloadWaring recommends the BB900G for 1–25 drinks per day.
- WarrantyThe BB900G has a limited one-year warranty.
My Recommendation
I would consider the BB900 for light use, plain controls, and its chrome look. Check the suffix first. The supplied image and affiliate link are carried over as provided; their exact model match is unverified.
| Best For | Why |
|---|---|
| Light drink service | The BB900G has a stated range of 1–25 drinks per day. |
| Glass-jar buyers | The BB900G comes with a 40-ounce glass jar. |
| Classic home bars | The chrome base and plain switch fit a simple setup. |
Waring BB340 vs BB900: Side-by-Side Comparison
The key to Waring BB340 vs BB900 is daily use. The BB340 has more control tools. The BB900G keeps the process simple.
These ratings reflect feature fit, not lab scores. The tables use the BB900G unless a row names another version. I have no measured data for noise, texture, or blend speed.
Controls: Which Gives More Choice?
In Waring BB340 vs BB900, the timer and pulse key create the clearest gap.
| Feature | Product 1 | Product 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Main controls | Electronic touchpad | Toggle switch |
| Speed choices | Low and high | Low and high |
| Extra control | Pulse and 99-second timer | No separate pulse key or countdown timer |
⭐ Waring BB340 – 9/10 | Waring BB900G – 6/10
The BB340 has the edge for control; the BB900G wins for a plain switch.
Daily Use: Which Fits More Drinks?
I would match the blender to the drink count before I chose by looks.
| Feature | Product 1 | Product 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Stated daily range | 25–49 drinks | 1–25 drinks |
| Best fit | More frequent drink prep | Light drink prep |
| Repeat batches | Timer supports set times | User tracks blend time |
⭐ Waring BB340 – 9/10 | Waring BB900G – 6/10
The BB340 leads for a busier routine, based on Waring’s stated workload ranges.
Jar Size: Which Holds More?
The Waring BB340 vs BB900 jar choice depends on the BB900 suffix.
| Feature | Product 1 | Product 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Main jar size | 48 ounces | BB900G: 40 ounces |
| Main jar material | BPA-free copolyester | BB900G: glass |
| Other versions | BB340S is a separate steel-jar model | BB900P: 48-ounce plastic; BB900S: 32-ounce steel |
⭐ Waring BB340 – 8/10 | Waring BB900G – 7/10
The BB340 leads on size against the BB900G; the BB900P matches its stated capacity.
Motor Specs: What Do They Tell Us?
Waring BB340 vs BB900 motor labels need care because older BB340 sheets differ.
| Feature | Product 1 | Product 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Current listed horsepower | 1.5 HP | BB900G: 1/2 HP |
| Listed input power | 820 watts | BB900G: 360 watts |
| Key limit | Older sheets list 1 HP | Lower power does not prove poor results |
⭐ Waring BB340 – 8/10 | Waring BB900G – 6/10
The BB340 leads on listed power, but these specs do not prove a texture or speed gap.
Cleanup: Which Eases the Chore?
Sticky drink spills make small design details matter.
| Feature | Product 1 | Product 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Control surface | Flat touchpad | Raised toggle switch |
| Base detail | Removable rubberized jar pad | Chrome die-cast housing |
| Jar care | Follow the exact jar instructions | Care varies by glass, plastic, or steel jar |
⭐ Waring BB340 – 8/10 | Waring BB900G – 7/10
I give the BB340 a small edge for its flat panel and lift-off pad.
Counter Space: Which Fits Better?
For Waring BB340 vs BB900, measure the shelf and counter before you buy.
| Feature | Product 1 | Product 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Height | 16 inches | BB900G: 16.5 inches |
| Width | 7.625 inches | BB900G: 8 inches |
| Depth | 8.375 inches | BB900G: 7 inches |
⭐ Waring BB340 – 8/10 | Waring BB900G – 8/10
This is a tie: the BB340 is shorter and narrower, while the BB900G is less deep.
Final Verdict: Which Should You Buy?
My Waring BB340 vs BB900 pick is the BB340 for frequent drink prep. Its timer, pulse key, and higher stated daily range make it the stronger feature choice. Think of the timer as a small guardrail for a repeat recipe.
I would choose the BB900G for light use, a glass jar, and a classic chrome look. The BB900P makes more sense if you want a 48-ounce plastic jar with simple controls. Check the full model code and seller listing before you buy. Neither choice earns a hands-on performance claim here.
